Tania Sourdin

Papers

Total Citations

189

H-Index

About

Tania Sourdin is a distinguished legal scholar whose research sits at the compelling intersection of artificial intelligence, judicial decision-making, and the future of justice systems. Her most influential work, "Judge v Robot? Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Decision-Making" (2018), has garnered 186 citations and stands as a landmark contribution to the emerging field of legal technology, critically examining how AI may replace or augment human judicial functions in an era of rapid technological transformation. Sourdin's scholarship engages with profound questions about the nature of justice itself — whether algorithmic systems can replicate the nuanced reasoning, ethical judgment, and human empathy that underpin effective judicial processes. Her work serves as an essential reference point for legal theorists, policymakers, and technologists grappling with the implications of automation in law. By mapping the boundaries between human judicial capacity and machine intelligence, Sourdin has helped shape scholarly discourse around legal innovation at a pivotal moment in history. Her research is invaluable for students and practitioners seeking to understand how courts and legal institutions must evolve in response to the challenges and opportunities presented by artificial intelligence.