首页 /研究 /Intelligent Machines and Warfare Historical Debates and Epistemologically Motivated Concerns
OTHER

Intelligent Machines and Warfare Historical Debates and Epistemologically Motivated Concerns

Roberto Cordeschi, Guglielmo Tamburrini

发表年份
2005
引用次数
6

摘要

The early examples of self-directing robots attracted the interest of both scientific and military communities. Biologists regarded these devices as material models of animal tropisms. Engineers envisaged the possibility of turning self-directing robots into new “intelligent” torpedoes during World War I. Starting from World War II, more extensive interactions developed between theoretical inquiry and applied military research on the subject of adaptive and intelligent machinery. Pioneers of Cybernetics were involved in the development of goal-seeking warfare devices. But collaboration occasionally turned into open dissent. Founder of Cybernetics Norbert Wiener, in the aftermath of World War II, argued against military applications of learning machines, by drawing on epistemological appraisals of machine learning techniques. This connection between philosophy of science and techno-ethics is both strengthened and extended here. It is strengthened by an epistemological analysis of contemporary machine learning from examples; it is extended by a reflection on ceteris paribus conditions for models of adaptive behaviours.

关键词

CyberneticsDissentEpistemologyArtificial intelligenceCognitive scienceComputer scienceSociologyEnvironmental ethicsPolitical sciencePhilosophy

相关论文

查看 OTHER 分类全部论文