Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation for Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children

Abstract

No AccessJournal of UrologyEditorial1 Jun 2017Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation for Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children Glenn M. Cannon and Michael C. Ost Glenn M. CannonGlenn M. Cannon and Michael C. OstMichael C. Ost View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.112AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail References 1 : Multi-institutional review of outcomes and complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. J Urol2017; 197: 1555. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation: a single surgeon comparison to open surgery. J Pediatr Urol2014; 10: 875. Google Scholar 3 : Objective pain assessment after ureteral reimplantation: comparison of open versus robotic approach. J Pediatr Urol2015; 11: 82.e1. Google Scholar 4 : Parent and patient perceptions of robotic vs open urological surgery scars in children. J Urol2013; 190: 244. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Surgical scar location preference for pediatric kidney and pelvic surgery: a crowdsourced survey. J Urol2017; 197: 911. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. J Urol1997; 157: 1846. Link, Google Scholar 7 : Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux Guidelines Panel summary report: clinical practice guidelines for screening siblings of children with vesicoureteral reflux and neonates/infants with prenatal hydronephrosis. J Urol2010; 184: 1145. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Open versus minimally invasive ureteroneocystostomy: a population-level analysis. J Pediatr Urol2016; 12: 232.e1. Google Scholar 9 : Robotic versus open pediatric ureteral reimplantation: costs and complications from a nationwide sample. J Pediatr Urol2016; 12: 408.e1. Google Scholar 10 : Commentary to "Robotic versus open pediatric ureteral reimplantation: costs and complications from a nationwide sample journal of pediatric urology". J Pediatr Urol2016; 12: 409. Google Scholar 11 : Robotic assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children: case matched comparative study with open surgical approach. J Urol2011; 185: 1870. Link, Google Scholar 12 : Anesthetic neurotoxicity—clinical implications of animal models. N Engl J Med2015; 372: 796. Google Scholar © 2017 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGargollo P, Granberg C, Gong E, Tu D, Whittam B and Dajusta D (2018) Complex Robotic Lower Urinary Tract Surgery in Patients with History of Open SurgeryJournal of Urology, VOL. 201, NO. 1, (162-168), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019. Volume 197Issue 6June 2017Page: 1379-1381 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Glenn M. Cannon More articles by this author Michael C. Ost More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...