首页 /研究 /A pilot study comparing ergonomics in laparoscopy and robotics: beyond anecdotes, and subjective claims
SURGICAL

A pilot study comparing ergonomics in laparoscopy and robotics: beyond anecdotes, and subjective claims

Li‐Jen Kuo, James Chi‐Yong Ngu, Yen‐Kuang Lin, Chia‐Che Chen, Yue-Her Tang

发表年份
2020
引用次数
20
访问权限
开放获取

摘要

We aimed to use hand dexterity and grip strength test as objective measures to compare the difference in surgeon fatigue associated with robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. We used the Purdue Pegboard Test to assess hand dexterity and the Camry Electronic Handgrip Dynamometer to assess hand grip strength. Eighteen patients were operated on, including 10 robotic and 8 laparoscopic cases. Statistical analysis revealed no difference in dexterity or muscle fatigue after operating with the robot. In contrast, there was a significant difference in the hand grip strength of both hands after laparoscopic surgery. Our results show that the resultant fatigue after laparoscopy affects both hands of the surgeon. In contrast, there was no difference in dexterity or muscle fatigue after operating with the robot. Given the demands of complex colorectal surgeries, robotics may be a means of optimizing surgeon performance by reducing fatigue.

关键词

RoboticsGrip strengthMedicineDynamometerSignificant differencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyTest (biology)Laparoscopic surgeryLaparoscopy

相关论文

查看 SURGICAL 分类全部论文