Robustness (evolution)
Related papers: 20
About
Robustness in the context of evolutionary and adaptive robotics refers to a system's ability to maintain reliable, effective performance despite uncertainty, damage, environmental variation, or unforeseen disturbances. Inspired by Darwinian principles, evolutionary approaches develop robot controllers, morphologies, or behaviors through iterative selection processes that naturally favor solutions capable of handling diverse and challenging conditions. In robotics and AI, robustness manifests across many domains: SLAM systems that operate accurately in dynamic environments, legged robots that adapt their gait after hardware damage, manipulators that handle singularities gracefully, and soft grippers that tolerate physical deformations. Techniques such as sliding mode control, adaptive controllers, and self-modeling frameworks all pursue robustness through different mechanisms—biological or algorithmic. This property is critically important because real-world deployment exposes robots to conditions that laboratory testing cannot fully anticipate. A robust system reduces reliance on precise models or ideal operating conditions, enabling autonomous agents to remain functional and safe in unpredictable settings, which is fundamental to achieving genuine autonomy across applications ranging from search-and-rescue to industrial manipulation.
Top Researchers
Top Cited Papers
Parallel Tracking and Mapping for Small AR Workspaces
Georg Klein, David W. Murray
Citations: 4244 • 2007
Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age
Citations: 3257 • 2016
Continuous finite-time control for robotic manipulators with terminal sliding mode
Shuanghe Yu, Xinghuo Yu, Bijan Shirinzadeh, Zhihong Man
Citations: 2605 • 2005
Soft Robotic Grippers
Jun Shintake, Vito Cacucciolo, Dario Floreano, Herbert Shea
Citations: 1850 • 2018
Robust Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots
Sebastian Thrun, Dieter Fox, Wolfram Burgard, Frank Dellaert
Citations: 1803 • 2001
Evolutionary Robotics
Stefano Nolfi, Dario Floreano
Citations: 1514 • 2000
A new approach to visual servoing in robotics
Bernard Espiau, François Chaumette, Patrick Rives
Citations: 1357 • 1993
A new approach to visual servoing in robotics
Bernard Espiau, François Chaumette, Patrick Rives
Citations: 1330 • 1992
Variable structure control of nonlinear systems: a new approach
Wei-Bing Gao, J. C. Hung
Citations: 1282 • 1993
Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologically Inspired Robotics
Rolf Pfeifer, Max Lungarella, Fumiya Iida
Citations: 1214 • 2007
DynaSLAM: Tracking, Mapping, and Inpainting in Dynamic Scenes
Citations: 1152 • 2018
Wearable and Highly Sensitive Graphene Strain Sensors for Human Motion Monitoring
Yan Wang, Li Wang, Tingting Yang, Xiao Li, Xiaobei Zang, Miao Zhu, Kunlin Wang, Dehai Wu, Hongwei Zhu
Citations: 1071 • 2014
Inverse Kinematic Solutions With Singularity Robustness for Robot Manipulator Control
Yoshihiko Nakamura, Hideo Hanafusa
Citations: 1064 • 1986
The attitude control problem
John T. Wen, Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado
Citations: 1053 • 1991
Adaptive manipulator control: A case study
J.-J.E. Slotine, Weiping Li
Citations: 1027 • 1988
Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain
Citations: 1024 • 2020
Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot Systems [Grand Challenges of Robotics]
Mark Yim, Wei‐Min Shen, Behnam Salemi, Daniela Rus, Mark Moll, Hod Lipson, Eric Klavins, Gregory S. Chirikjian
Citations: 1020 • 2007
Hydraulic hydrogel actuators and robots optically and sonically camouflaged in water
Hyunwoo Yuk, Shaoting Lin, Chu Ma, Mahdi Takaffoli, Nicholas X. Fang, Xuanhe Zhao
Citations: 972 • 2017
A robust MIMO terminal sliding mode control scheme for rigid robotic manipulators
Andrew P. Papliński, Hong Ren Wu
Citations: 966 • 1994
2 1/2 D visual servoing
Ezio Malis, François Chaumette, S. Boudet
Citations: 943 • 1999