Robotic Surgery for Gastrointestinal Malignancies—A Review of How Far Have We Come in Pancreatic, Gastric, Liver, and Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Robotic-assisted surgery offers technological advantages such as three-dimensional visualization and improved dexterity, yet its clinical adoption in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies is supported by evidence of varying quality, consisting mainly of retrospective studies. This review provides a structured summary of the current evidence for robotic surgery in pancreatic, gastric, liver, and colorectal cancers. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to assess and summarize the perioperative, long-term, and oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery compared to laparoscopic and open approaches for the aforementioned GI malignancies. RESULTS: The application of the robotic platform is most advanced in colorectal surgery. High-quality evidence for rectal cancer demonstrates improved quality of mesorectal specimens, better preservation of urinary and sexual function, and lower local recurrence rates. Across all reviewed GI malignancies, robotic surgery consistently shows advantages in lower conversion-to-open rates, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and shorter hospital stays, though it is associated with longer operative times and higher costs. The evidence for pancreatic and liver surgery is less mature due to the complexity of these procedures. Data for gastric surgery suggests improved lymph node retrieval and, in one long-term study, better disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: The highest-quality evidence supports the robotic approach for rectal cancer, showing clear functional and oncological benefits. While several perioperative advantages are consistently reported across all GI sites, robust data demonstrating superior long-term survival are still limited for most procedures.