First Clinical Experience in Urologic Surgery with a Novel Robotic Lightweight Laparoscope Holder
- Year
- 2012
- Citations
- 9
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the feasibility and the safety of a surgeon-controlled robotic endoscope holder in laparoscopic surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 2010 to September 2010, 20 patients were enrolled prospectively to undergo a laparoscopic procedure using an innovative robotic endoscope holder. Two surgeons performed six adrenalectomies, four sacrocolpopexies, five pyeloplasties, four radical prostatectomies, and one radical nephrectomy. Demographic data, overall setup time, operative time, number of assistants needed were reviewed. Surgeon satisfaction regarding the ergonomics was assessed using a 10-point scale. Postoperative clinical outcomes were reviewed at day 1 and 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: The per-protocol analysis was performed on 17 patients for whom the robot was effectively used for surgery. Median age was 63 years; 10 (59%) patients were female. Median body mass index was 26.8. Surgical procedures were completed with the robot in 12 (71%) cases. Median number of surgical assistant was 0. Overall setup time with the robot was 19 minutes; operative time was 130 minutes during which the robot was used 71% of the time. Mean hospital stay was 6.94 ± 2.3 days. Median score regarding the easiness of use was 7. Median pain level was 1.5/10 at day 1 and 0 at 1 month postoperatively. Open conversion was needed in one (6%) case, and four minor complications occurred in two (12%) patients. CONCLUSION: This use of this novel robotic laparoscope holder is safe, feasible, and provides good comfort to the surgeon.
Keywords
Related papers
Campbell-Walsh urology
Alan J. Wein editor-in-chief
2012
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines
J. Alfred Witjes, Harman Max Bruins, Richard Cathomas +11 more
2020
Principles of Robot Motion: Theory, Algorithms, and Implementations
Howie Choset, Jean‐Claude Latombe
2005
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
Pedro T. Ramírez, Michael Frumovitz, René Pareja +16 more
2018