Home /Research /Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot?
HRI

Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot?

Maha Salem, Gabriella Lakatos, Farshid Amirabdollahian, Kerstin Dautenhahn

Year
2015
Citations
472
Access
Open access

Abstract

How do mistakes made by a robot affect its trustworthiness and acceptance in human-robot collaboration? We investigate how the perception of erroneous robot behavior may influence human interaction choices and the willingness to cooperate with the robot by following a number of its unusual requests. For this purpose, we conducted an experiment in which participants interacted with a home companion robot in one of two experimental conditions: (1) the correct mode or (2) the faulty mode. Our findings reveal that, while significantly affecting subjective perceptions of the robot and assessments of its reliability and trustworthiness, the robot's performance does not seem to substantially influence participants' decisions to (not) comply with its requests. However, our results further suggest that the nature of the task requested by the robot, e.g. whether its effects are revocable as opposed to irrevocable, has a significant impact on participants' willingness to follow its instructions.

Keywords

RobotTask (project management)Reliability (semiconductor)PerceptionTrustworthinessAffect (linguistics)Human–computer interactionComputer scienceHuman–robot interactionBehavior-based robotics

Related papers

Browse all HRI papers