Faster, Better, Cheaper: A Sociotechnical Perspective on Programmatic Choice, Success, and Failure in NASA’s Solar System Exploration Program

摘要

In the 1990s the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) reformulated its program of robotic solar system exploration missions.1 "Flagship" spacecraft like Viking, Voyager, and Galileo had dominated the program in the previous decade. Although wondrous and prolific missions, each took many years and a billion or more dollars to develop, allowing the agency to launch just a few of them. The 1990s instead found NASA deploying much smaller spacecraft to a variety of destinations within the solar system, including the renowned Mars Pathfinder, the first remotely controlled rover to reach another planet's surface, and for a fraction of the cost of its predecessors. The agency's plan was to concentrate on spacecraft with focused objectives and to use lean management techniques to reduce the cost of each mission, freeing resources to develop and launch more spacecraft more often to generate a steadier flow of data than infrequent, large missions could allow. But while NASA launched and achieved its goals for several missions developed under this "faster, better, cheaper" philosophy, five space science probes produced in this way failed before the decade's end. NASA soon thereafter backed away from this mode of planetary mission acquisition.2 KeywordsMars Global SurveyorLunar ProspectorPlanetary MissionMars PathfinderSolar System ExplorationThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.