Matthew R. Neville
Papers
1
Total Citations
16
H-Index
1
About
Matthew R. Neville is a surgical outcomes researcher whose work bridges urologic oncology and health services research, with a particular focus on how patient age and procedural approach shape recovery trajectories. His most-cited study, "Robotic vs. open cystectomy: How length-of-stay differences relate conditionally to age" (2019, 16 citations), offers a nuanced analysis of how the benefits of minimally invasive surgery—specifically reduced hospital stays—vary significantly across age groups. By demonstrating that the length-of-stay advantage of robotic cystectomy is not uniform but instead conditional on patient age, Neville challenges one-size-fits-all assumptions in surgical decision-making. This work highlights his broader contribution: using rigorous statistical methods to uncover effect heterogeneity in comparative effectiveness research. While his citation count reflects a focused, emerging career, the study’s clinical relevance is underscored by its publication in a leading urology journal and its potential to inform personalized surgical counseling for bladder cancer patients. Neville’s research exemplifies how careful attention to patient-level moderators can refine evidence-based practice, making him a promising voice in the ongoing effort to tailor surgical care to individual risk profiles.
Research Focus
Key Achievements
Top Papers
- 1