Back to directory
UR3e - Mobile Base Package

Let's compare

UR3e - Mobile Base Package

UR3e - Mobile Base Package

Universal Robots

Not yet assessed

Height
Payload
Verified autonomy
not assessed
Real deployment
not assessed
Status
Price
verified / really deployed unverified / demo-stage

UR3e - Mobile Base Package

Universal Robots
Unverified

The 'UR3e - Mobile Base Package' as described in the extracted facts is a combination of Universal Robots' UR3e collaborative robot arm (3 kg payload, 500 mm reach, 11.2 kg, Ø128 mm footprint) mounted on a mobile base platform. The UR3e itself is a well-documented, commercially available cobot from Universal Robots (a Teradyne Robotics company), with strong independent corroboration of its hardware specs. Several academic research papers demonstrate RL-based and reactive control approaches enabling autonomous mobile manipulation on UR-class hardware, but these are research prototypes, not the commercial product. The 'Mobile Base Package' as a specific integrated commercial product is not directly described in the supplied facts; specs and autonomy claims must be inferred from the UR3e arm facts plus research-context mobile manipulation evidence. A number of extracted facts (DIY Arduino robot, Neuro Robotics humanoid, ROS criticism) appear to be from unrelated systems and are treated as low-relevance noise.

Availability

Shipping

Specification

payload
3 kg / 6.6 lbs
reach
500 mm / 19.7 in
weight
11.2 kg / 24.7 lbs
degrees of freedom
6 rotating joints
power consumption
Average 100 W, peak 300 W

Price

No public price — contact the supplier for a quote.

Good · Bad · Ugly

Evidence-graded claims from the Universal Robots deep report

Good
  • UR cobots operate autonomously on programmed industrial tasks (pick & place, welding, machine tending, assembly, etc.) without a human performing or driving the task during operation.

    Wikipedia (independent) and Automate.org confirm cage-free autonomous task execution; community criticism on Reddit [15][16] targets programming/integration difficulty, not human-in-the-loop task performance, corroborating autonomous operation at the task level — though setup, programming, and maintenance overhead remain non-trivial.

    from Universal Robots deep report →
  • Universal Robots is the cobot market leader with approximately 40–50% market share and 50,000+ units installed worldwide.

    Automate.org (independent industry association) [14] and Wikipedia [13] both independently cite 50,000+ installations and ~40–50% market share as of 2022; the specific figures have not been re-verified post-2022, so current share may have shifted.

    from Universal Robots deep report →
  • UR cobots can operate collaboratively without safety cages or fencing, making them the first commercially viable cobot of this type.

    Wikipedia [13] independently confirms UR as the pioneer of commercially viable cage-free collaborative robots; safety certifications (ISO 10218, TÜV, UL 1740) are confirmed across official product pages [2][3][4], though independent third-party test reports of real-world cage-free deployments are not cited in the dossier.

    from Universal Robots deep report →
Bad
  • UR cobots deliver up to 65% higher joint accelerations and up to 37% faster cycle times versus the prior generation, with the UR15 achieving up to 5 m/s maximum speed.

    These figures come exclusively from UR's own official product pages [2][4] with no independent benchmark, third-party test, or customer validation cited in the dossier; furthermore, community sources [15][16] note UR cobots are slow and inaccurate compared to SCARA alternatives, suggesting the vendor's speed claims are relative only to prior UR generations.

    from Universal Robots deep report →
  • Total system cost (robot arm + gripper + integration/setup) is typically approximately 2x the base robot arm price.

    Multiple commerce sources [6][7] consistently cite the ~2x multiplier, but these are reseller/distributor sites rather than independent audits or customer case studies; community sources [19] suggest real-world integration costs and ongoing support costs can significantly exceed this estimate, making the figure plausible but unverified by neutral parties.

    from Universal Robots deep report →
  • The UR+ Ecosystem and partnerships (e.g., Rapid Robotics, Teradyne/Flex) meaningfully expand UR cobot deployment capabilities and scale.

    The Rapid Robotics partnership is reported by a trade news outlet [10], providing some independent corroboration, but the dossier contains no independent evidence of deployment outcomes, scale, or customer results from these partnerships — only vendor announcements and a single trade press item.

    from Universal Robots deep report →
Ugly
  • UR Care maximizes uptime and reduces total cost of ownership (TCO), with UR cobots trusted for reliable long-term deployment across industries.

    Independent community sources [19][20] report real-world deployment failures including overpromising by integrators, overly rosy cost projections, lack of long-term support, and insufficient training at handoff — directly contradicting the vendor's reliability and TCO claims, which are sourced only from UR's own marketing [1][11].

    from Universal Robots deep report →

About the company

Editorial directory of real robot products from leading global manufacturers. Each entry links to the manufacturer's official page.