Home /Research /Slow but Likeable? Inefficient Robots as Caring Team Members
HRI

Slow but Likeable? Inefficient Robots as Caring Team Members

Ryan P. Kelly, Leon Watts

Year
2017
Citations
2
Access
Open access

Abstract

This position paper discusses the notion of efficiency as a criterion for designing and evaluating the contributions that robots might make to human work teams. Participation in teams requires the coordination and prosecution of task-centric work activity but also requires the investment of caring social behavior as a distinctive kind of positive contribution to group interaction. Team spirit, emotional support, trust and reputation are all the outcome of such investments; they reinforce the capabilities of a team for particular joint activities, and contribute to its resilience over time. The requisite social behavior for these qualities of a team might be treated as a given in design considerations for human work teams. But the picture must change for human-robot teams: socially supportive behavior can only exist if it is explicitly designed in, and the consequent “task inefficiencies” are treated as a core part of the design equation. We draw on our own research on relational effort in social communication to offer some initial considerations about how task-inefficient action might be required for robots to engage in caring interactions with human collaborators.

Keywords

Task (project management)ReputationAction (physics)RobotPsychologyPsychological resilienceWork (physics)Social psychologyKnowledge managementTeam Spirit

Related papers

Browse all HRI papers