Redefining Precision: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Robotic‐Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer

Abstract

Minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopic surgery (LS) and robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) have transformed colorectal cancer (CRC) management. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated nine randomized controlled trials encompassing 2,758 patients to compare RAS and LS regarding perioperative, oncological, and long-term outcomes. RAS showed longer operative time but yielded benefits such as reduced conversion rates, greater lymph node retrieval, and lower circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity. Both techniques demonstrated comparable safety, mortality, and overall complication rates. While RAS presents certain advantages, further research is required to determine its cost-effectiveness and long-term oncological impact. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD420251025102.