Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Ureterocutaneostomy: A Potentially Optimal Solution for Octogenarian and Frail Patients with Bladder Cancer

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has become the primary approach for treating bladder cancer, replacing the traditional open procedure. The robotic approach, when combined with ureterocutaneostomy (UCS), offers significant advantages for octogenarians, who are at increased risk for perioperative complications. Methods: This observational, prospective, multicenter analysis is based on data from the Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry (RIC), collected from January 2017 to June 2020 across 28 major urological centers in Italy. We analyzed consecutive male and female patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion via the open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted technique. Inclusion criteria: patients aged 80 years or older, with a WHO Performance Status (PS) of 2–3, an American Society of Anesthesiologist score ≥3, a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 4, and a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min. Results: A total of 128 consecutive patients were included: 41 underwent RARC with UCS (Group 1), 65 open RC (ORC) with UCS (Group 2), and 22 laparoscopic RC (LRC) with UCS (Group 3). The cystectomy operative time was longer in robotic surgeries, while the lymph node dissection time was shorter. RARC with UCS showed statistically significant advantages in terms of lower median estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion rate, and length of hospital stay (LOS) compared to open and laparoscopic procedures. Intra- and postoperative complications were also lower in the RARC groups. Conclusions: Robotic cystectomy in high-volume referral centers (≥20 cystectomies per year) provides the best outcome for fragile patients. Beyond addressing the baseline pathology, RARC with UCS may represent a leading option, offering oncological control while reducing complications in this vulnerable age group.