Home /Research /Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for prevention of postoperative pain in women undergoing laparoscopic and robotic gynaecological surgery
SURGICAL

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for prevention of postoperative pain in women undergoing laparoscopic and robotic gynaecological surgery

Sarah Alsamman, David M. Haas, Insiyyah Patanwala, David A. Klein, Kelly Kasper, Charlotte Pickett

Year
2025
Citations
4

Abstract

RATIONALE: Pain control following laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery is key to successful recovery. The efficacy of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block compared to no block or a local anaesthetic injection has not been well established in this population. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of single-shot transversus abdominis plane blocks for the prevention of postoperative pain in women undergoing laparoscopic and robotic gynaecological surgery compared to no block, sham block, or injection of local anaesthetic. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two trials registers, and handsearched abstracts to 6 December 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adult women undergoing minimally invasive gynaecologic surgery that compared single-shot TAP block to no block, sham block, or injection of local anaesthetic. We excluded studies that were non-randomised or of non-gynaecologic surgery. OUTCOMES: Critical and important outcomes: participant-reported pain intensity 24 hours following surgery (combined, at rest, and with movement), adverse events (serious adverse events, nausea and vomiting, postoperative sedation), opioid consumption 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Other outcomes: pain intensity 2, 6, 12, and 48 hours after surgery, opioid consumption intraoperatively, time from surgery to first participant requirement for postoperative opioid, time from surgery until discharge. RISK OF BIAS: We assessed the risk of bias with RoB 1. SYNTHESIS METHODS: We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models. We calculated mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. We reported serious adverse events as described by the study authors. We summarised the certainty of evidence using GRADE methods. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included 21 RCTs with a total of 1645 participants. Studies were conducted in 10 countries, and published between 2011 and 2023. Six studies compared TAP block to no block, eight compared TAP block to an injection of local anaesthetic, and seven studies compared TAP block to sham block. Studies reported pain outcomes in various ways, so we made assumptions to allow us to combine data. SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS: = 99%; low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported 48-hour postoperative opioid consumption. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Amongst women undergoing minimally invasive gynaecologic surgery, we did not find a clinically meaningful effect of TAP block on postoperative pain or opioid consumption. However, there may be a small reduction of pain using TAP blocks compared to local anaesthetic or sham blocks. The TAP block is probably safe, since no adverse events were noted amongst the 525 women who received a block, and for whom safety data were available. The evidence is limited by heterogeneity in the results, risk of bias in the studies, and assumptions made for synthesis when combining data. FUNDING: The review had no dedicated funding. REGISTRATION: Protocol (2022): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015145.

Keywords

MedicinePostoperative nausea and vomitingAdverse effectAnesthesiaSurgeryRandomized controlled trialLaparoscopic surgerySedationNauseaPopulation

Related papers

Browse all SURGICAL papers