Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Oncological Outcomes
- Year
- 2021
- Citations
- 7
Abstract
The treatment of rectal cancer is complex and involves specialized multidisciplinary care, although the tenet is still rooted in a high-quality total mesorectal excision. The robotic platform is one of many tools in the arsenal to assist dissection in the low pelvis. This article is a comprehensive review of the oncological outcome comparing robotic vs laparoscopic rectal cancer resection, with a particular focus on total mesorectal excision. There is no statistical difference in total mesorectal grade, circumferential margin, distal margin, and lymph node harvest. Survival data are less mature, but there is also no difference in disease-free or overall survival between the two techniques. Although additional randomized trials are still needed to validate these findings, both techniques are currently acceptable in the minimally invasive treatment of rectal cancer, and surgeon preference is paramount to safe and optimal resection.
Keywords
Related papers
Campbell-Walsh urology
Alan J. Wein editor-in-chief
2012
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines
J. Alfred Witjes, Harman Max Bruins, Richard Cathomas +11 more
2020
Principles of Robot Motion: Theory, Algorithms, and Implementations
Howie Choset, Jean‐Claude Latombe
2005
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
Pedro T. Ramírez, Michael Frumovitz, René Pareja +16 more
2018