Home /Research /Advances on minimally invasive approach for benign total hysterectomy: a systematic review
SURGICAL

Advances on minimally invasive approach for benign total hysterectomy: a systematic review

Marina Paula Andres, Giuliano Moysés Borrelli, Maurício Simões Abrão

Year
2017
Citations
10
Access
Open access

Abstract

Hysterectomy is one of the most commonly performed gynecologic surgeries, mainly for uterine myomas, abnormal uterine bleeding, and prolapses. It can be performed through several routes, each of which has its advantages and disadvantages. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate recent advances in surgical outcomes of benign total hysterectomies by any route: vaginal (VH), laparoscopic (LH), laparoscopically assisted vaginal (LAVH), single-port (SP), and robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RH). The search was applied to the PubMed electronic database by using keywords "hysterectomy" and "uterine benign disease", "adenomyosis", and "myoma". Prospective and randomized trials of the last 3 years were included. Nine studies were selected and showed that VH was superior to LH, LAVH, and RH in terms of hospital stay and operation time and had the same complication rate and lower costs. SP hysterectomy had no clear advantages over VH or conventional LH.

Keywords

MedicineMyomaHysterectomyAdenomyosisLaparoscopySystematic reviewRandomized controlled trialComplicationGynecologySurgery

Related papers

Browse all SURGICAL papers