Redefining Knee Arthroplasty: Does Robotic Assistance Improve Outcomes Beyond Alignment? An Evidence-Based Umbrella Review

Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) has been introduced to improve surgical precision and alignment in knee replacement procedures. However, its impact on clinical outcomes, pain relief, and cost-effectiveness remains debated. This umbrella review synthesizes evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing rTKA to conventional TKA. Methods: An umbrella review was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing rTKA with conventional TKA were included. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools. Primary outcomes included hospital stay, radiographic alignment, postoperative pain, functional outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Results: Ten systematic reviews were included. rTKA demonstrated superior alignment accuracy and a reduction in alignment outliers. Some studies reported shorter hospital stays and lower early postoperative pain scores for rTKA. However, these benefits did not consistently translate into improved long-term functional outcomes, patient satisfaction, or reduced revision rates. Cost-effectiveness analyses indicated that rTKA remains an expensive option, with benefits largely dependent on surgical volume and healthcare system resources. Conclusions: While rTKA improves surgical precision and may offer short-term advantages, its long-term superiority over conventional TKA remains unproven. Higher costs and longer operative times limit its widespread adoption. Further high-quality, long-term studies are needed to determine its clinical and economic value.