Home /Research /Toward focused ultrasound neuromodulation in deep brain stimulator implanted patients: Ex-vivo thermal, kinetic and targeting feasibility assessment
OTHER

Toward focused ultrasound neuromodulation in deep brain stimulator implanted patients: Ex-vivo thermal, kinetic and targeting feasibility assessment

Can Sarica, Anton Fomenko, Jean‐François Nankoo, Ghazaleh Darmani, Artur Vetkas, Kazuaki Yamamoto, Andrés M. Lozano, Robert Chen

Year
2022
Citations
20
Access
Open access

Abstract

Non-invasive transcranial ultrasound (TUS) neuromodulation is an emerging technique that has been demonstrated as safe in humans for cortical [1Legon W. Sato T.F. Opitz A. Mueller J. Barbour A. Williams A. et al.Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans.Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17: 322-329Google Scholar, 2Fomenko A. Chen K.S. Nankoo J.F. Saravanamuttu J. Wang Y. El-Baba M. et al.Systematic examination of low-intensity ultrasound parameters on human motor cortex excitability and behavior.Elife. 2020; 9Google Scholar, 3Lee W. Kim H.C. Jung Y. Chung Y.A. Song I.U. Lee J.H. et al.Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation of human primary visual cortex.Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 34026Google Scholar, 4Beisteiner R. Matt E. Fan C. Baldysiak H. Schonfeld M. Philippi Novak T. et al.Transcranial pulse stimulation with ultrasound in Alzheimer's disease-A new navigated focal brain therapy.Adv Sci. 2020; 7: 1902583Google Scholar, 5Zeng K. Darmani G. Fomenko A. Xia X. Tran S. Nankoo J.F. et al.Induction of human motor cortex plasticity by theta burst transcranial ultrasound stimulation.Ann Neurol. 2021; ([Online ahead of print])Google Scholar] and subcortical [[6]Cain J.A. Visagan S. Johnson M.A. Crone J. Blades R. Spivak N.M. et al.Real time and delayed effects of subcortical low intensity focused ultrasound.Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 6100Google Scholar,[7]Nicodemus N.E. Becerra S. Kuhn T.P. Packham H.R. Duncan J. Mahdavi K. et al.Focused transcranial ultrasound for treatment of neurodegenerative dementia.Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019; 5: 374-381Google Scholar] targets. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems with local field potential (LFP) recording ability [[8]Sarica C. Iorio-Morin C. Aguirre-Padilla D.H. Najjar A. Paff M. Fomenko A. et al.Implantable pulse generators for deep brain stimulation: challenges, complications, and strategies for practicality and longevity.Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15Google Scholar] might be utilized to record TUS-induced LFP changes and acoustic pressure induced artefact in the LFP recordings can be regarded as an evidence of engagement of acoustic waves with the target. Moreover, combining non-invasive brain stimulation with DBS has therapeutic implications, such as measuring alterations in pathological deep brain oscillations as an objective clinical outcome of TUS stimulation [[9]Ni Z. Udupa K. Hallett M. Chen R. Effects of deep brain stimulation on the primary motor cortex: insights from transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.Clin Neurophysiol. 2019; 130: 558-567Google Scholar]. Nevertheless, the safety of this utilization needs to be tested ex vivo before human application. Herein, we report our safety and feasibility experiments with the eventual objective of stimulating DBS-implanted subjects with TUS. Please see Supplemental Methods for full protocol. We designed two phantom models; one consisting of a polycarbonate box filled with a semisolid gel with acoustic properties similar to brain tissue containing a partial human cadaver skull: skull phantom (Fig. 1A) or an empty no-skull phantom (Supp.Figure1A). A four-channel TUS transducer was used with same sonication parameters for all experiment (Power/ch: 22 W, ISPPA: 30 W/cm2, ISPTA: 15 W/cm2, fundamental frequency: 500 kHz, focal depth: 60 mm, burst length: 0.5 ms, duty cycle 50%). A DBS lead was attached to a 3-axis robotic arm. The robot-driven lead was placed in different spatial locations in x- and y-axes as in a grid while the z-axis kept constant at a 55 mm distance from the transducer in the robotic-arm skull phantom model (Fig. 1A). A thermal sensor was attached to a DBS lead that was placed 60 mm away from the transducer with two different attachment methods (Supp.Figure1B). Various conditions with different combinations [skull/no-skull phantom, two different probe attachment methods, continuous or pulsed sonication, sonication time (1, 3 or 30 minutes), no-, 1- or 2-lead] were tested. Recordings were perf

Keywords

NeuromodulationEx vivoUltrasoundMedicineFocused ultrasoundIn vivoBiomedical engineeringRadiologyInternal medicineStimulation

Related papers

Browse all OTHER papers