Back to directory
UR7e - Cleanroom Candidate

Let's compare

UR7e - Cleanroom Candidate

UR7e - Cleanroom Candidate

Universal Robots

Not yet assessed

Height
Payload
Verified autonomy
not assessed
Real deployment
not assessed
Status
Price
verified / really deployed unverified / demo-stage

UR7e - Cleanroom Candidate

Universal Robots
Unverified

The UR7e is Universal Robots' upgraded successor to the UR5e, offering 7.5 kg payload, 850 mm reach, and a compact 151 mm footprint at 20.6 kg arm weight. It is a 6-DOF collaborative robot arm running PolyScope software (both PolyScope 5 and PolyScope X), priced at approximately $38,363 USD. Cleanroom suitability is a key consideration: the predecessor UR5e achieved ISO Class 5 (arm) / ISO Class 6 (control box) per Fraunhofer testing at 80% payload/speed, and the UR7e is the direct successor in the same form factor, making it a plausible cleanroom candidate — though no UR7e-specific cleanroom certification data was found in the supplied facts. Independent community reports document intermittent safety faults (C309A11/C306A0) during continuous operation that persisted even after robot replacement, and note that ur_rtde is not fully tested with PolyScope X.

Availability

Shipping

Specification

hardware_payload
7.5 kg / 16 lbs
hardware_reach
850 mm / 33.5 in
hardware_arm_weight
20.6 kg / 45.4 lbs
hardware_controller_weight
12 kg; dimensions 460 mm × 449 mm × 254 mm
hardware_power_input
100–240 VAC, 47–440 Hz
degrees_of_freedom
6 DOF (inferred from UR e-Series family; UR5e confirmed 6-DOF in research context)

Price

No public price — contact the supplier for a quote.

Good · Bad · Ugly

Evidence-graded claims from the Universal Robots deep report

Good
  • UR cobots operate autonomously on programmed industrial tasks (pick & place, welding, machine tending, assembly, etc.) without a human performing or driving the task during operation.

    Wikipedia (independent) and Automate.org confirm cage-free autonomous task execution; community criticism on Reddit [15][16] targets programming/integration difficulty, not human-in-the-loop task performance, corroborating autonomous operation at the task level — though setup, programming, and maintenance overhead remain non-trivial.

    from Universal Robots deep report →
  • Universal Robots is the cobot market leader with approximately 40–50% market share and 50,000+ units installed worldwide.

    Automate.org (independent industry association) [14] and Wikipedia [13] both independently cite 50,000+ installations and ~40–50% market share as of 2022; the specific figures have not been re-verified post-2022, so current share may have shifted.

    from Universal Robots deep report →
  • UR cobots can operate collaboratively without safety cages or fencing, making them the first commercially viable cobot of this type.

    Wikipedia [13] independently confirms UR as the pioneer of commercially viable cage-free collaborative robots; safety certifications (ISO 10218, TÜV, UL 1740) are confirmed across official product pages [2][3][4], though independent third-party test reports of real-world cage-free deployments are not cited in the dossier.

    from Universal Robots deep report →
Bad
  • UR cobots deliver up to 65% higher joint accelerations and up to 37% faster cycle times versus the prior generation, with the UR15 achieving up to 5 m/s maximum speed.

    These figures come exclusively from UR's own official product pages [2][4] with no independent benchmark, third-party test, or customer validation cited in the dossier; furthermore, community sources [15][16] note UR cobots are slow and inaccurate compared to SCARA alternatives, suggesting the vendor's speed claims are relative only to prior UR generations.

    from Universal Robots deep report →
  • Total system cost (robot arm + gripper + integration/setup) is typically approximately 2x the base robot arm price.

    Multiple commerce sources [6][7] consistently cite the ~2x multiplier, but these are reseller/distributor sites rather than independent audits or customer case studies; community sources [19] suggest real-world integration costs and ongoing support costs can significantly exceed this estimate, making the figure plausible but unverified by neutral parties.

    from Universal Robots deep report →
  • The UR+ Ecosystem and partnerships (e.g., Rapid Robotics, Teradyne/Flex) meaningfully expand UR cobot deployment capabilities and scale.

    The Rapid Robotics partnership is reported by a trade news outlet [10], providing some independent corroboration, but the dossier contains no independent evidence of deployment outcomes, scale, or customer results from these partnerships — only vendor announcements and a single trade press item.

    from Universal Robots deep report →
Ugly
  • UR Care maximizes uptime and reduces total cost of ownership (TCO), with UR cobots trusted for reliable long-term deployment across industries.

    Independent community sources [19][20] report real-world deployment failures including overpromising by integrators, overly rosy cost projections, lack of long-term support, and insufficient training at handoff — directly contradicting the vendor's reliability and TCO claims, which are sourced only from UR's own marketing [1][11].

    from Universal Robots deep report →

About the company

Editorial directory of real robot products from leading global manufacturers. Each entry links to the manufacturer's official page.