Home /Research /Comparison of perioperative and functional outcomes of single-incision versus standard multi-incision robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomized trial
SURGICAL

Comparison of perioperative and functional outcomes of single-incision versus standard multi-incision robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomized trial

Shida Fan, Zhengjun Chen, Fang Zhou, Qian Lv, Dong Wang, Shangqing Ren, Xuemei Tian

Year
2024
Citations
3
Access
Open access

Abstract

Abstract To compare perioperative and functional outcomes between improved (port-free) single-site robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (pf-ssRARP) and standard multi-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (MPRARP). A total of 372 consecutive patients underwent RARAP using the da Vinci Si ® robotic surgical system. Group I ( n = 210) included patients undergoing pf-ssRARP and Group II ( n = 162) included patients undergoing MPRARP. Demographics and perioperative data including postoperative recovery outcomes were recorded and compared between the two groups. Overall mean operative time was significantly shorter with the pf-ssRARP compared to the MPRARP ( p < 0.05). The length of hospitalization after the pf-ssRARP was shorter ( p < 0.05). In Group I, the positive surgical margin rate was 15.2%; while in Group II, the positive margin rate was 33.3% ( p < 0.05). The rate of instant urinary continence was significantly higher in Group I than in Group II ( p < 0.05). The percentage of urinary continence was higher in the pf-ssRARP than in the MPRARP, at 6 months post-surgery ( p < 0.05) and 9 months post-surgery ( p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the proportion of erectile function in the pf-ssRARP and MPRARP groups at the time of reaching the endpoint of this study ( p > 0.05). The two groups were comparable in terms of total hospitalization costs ( p < 0.05). The improved (port-free) single-site robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a practical and easy technique to implement in clinical practice. Extraperitoneal implementation of the modified technique requires only a small incision, no special PORT, no additional auxiliary foramen creation, increased postoperative aesthetics and reduced hospitalization costs, and a high percentage of early postoperative urinary control recovery.

Keywords

MedicinePerioperativeLaparoscopic radical prostatectomyProstatectomyUrinary continenceSurgeryUrologyPort (circuit theory)Prostate cancerInternal medicine

Related papers

Browse all SURGICAL papers