Radical Prostatectomy: A Current Perspective

Abstract

No AccessJournal of UrologyEditorial1 Aug 2007Radical Prostatectomy: A Current Perspectiveis companion ofA Direct Comparison of Robotic Assisted Versus Pure Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institution ExperienceImpact of Nerve Sparing Technique on Patient Self-Assessed Outcomes After Radical Perineal ProstatectomyNew Insights Into the Pathogenesis of Penile Shortening After Radical Prostatectomy and the Role of Postoperative Sexual Function David S. Yee and Thomas E. Ahlering David S. YeeDavid S. Yee More articles by this author and Thomas E. AhleringThomas E. Ahlering Financial interest and/or other relationship with Intuitive Surgical. More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.032AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Radical Prostatectomy: A Current Perspective." The Journal of Urology, 178(2), pp. 376–377 References 1 : Early patient self-assessed outcomes of nerve-sparing radical perineal prostatectomy. Urology2005; 66: 582. Google Scholar 2 : Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy–does it have an impact on urinary continence?. J Urol2006; 176: 189. Link, Google Scholar 3 : Neuroanatomy of the external urethral sphincter: implications for urinary continence preservation during radical prostate surgery. J Urol1995; 153: 337. Link, Google Scholar 4 : Post-robotic prostatectomy urinary continence: characterization of perfect continence versus occasional dribbling in pad-free men. Urology2006; 67: 785. Google Scholar 5 : A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol2003; 169: 1462. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Pilot study of changes in stretched penile length 3 months after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology2001; 58: 567. Google Scholar 7 : Penile length changes after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int2005; 96: 472. Google Scholar 8 : Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences?. BJU Int2005; 96: 39. Google Scholar 9 : Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic. Urology2005; 66: 101. Google Scholar Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California© 2007 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesJournal of Urology11 Jun 2007A Direct Comparison of Robotic Assisted Versus Pure Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institution ExperienceJournal of Urology11 Jun 2007Impact of Nerve Sparing Technique on Patient Self-Assessed Outcomes After Radical Perineal ProstatectomyJournal of Urology13 Jun 2007New Insights Into the Pathogenesis of Penile Shortening After Radical Prostatectomy and the Role of Postoperative Sexual Function Volume 178Issue 2August 2007Page: 376-377 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2007 by American Urological AssociationMetricsAuthor Information David S. Yee More articles by this author Thomas E. Ahlering Financial interest and/or other relationship with Intuitive Surgical. More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...