Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Harvesting of DIEP and Latissimus Dorsi Flaps for Breast Reconstruction in Post-Mastectomy Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Robotic breast reconstruction is an innovative surgical technique that integrates robotic technology into breast reconstruction procedures, offering several advantages over conventional approaches. These benefits include enhanced visualization, increased surgical dexterity, and superior cosmetic outcomes. This study aims to comprehensively compare robotic-assisted and conventional breast reconstruction approaches in terms of complication profiles and operation-related measurements. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CENTRAL, and VHL from inception to October 2024 to identify relevant studies. Risk ratios for the following complications were calculated between the groups: donor site seroma, hematoma, infection, and unplanned reoperation. Mean differences were also calculated for the duration of surgery, length of postoperative hospital stays, and opioid use. Results: A meta-analysis was performed on 9 studies including a total of 1094 patients. No significant differences were found between the groups in the risk ratios for reoperation, seroma formation, delayed healing, infections, and hematomas. Similarly, there were no significant differences in postoperative opioid use. The duration of surgery was longer in the robot-assisted reconstruction group, whereas the duration of hospital stay was shorter compared to the conventional group. Meta-regression analysis for the duration of surgery model showed that none of the moderators had a statistically significant effect on this outcome. ROBINS-I assessment indicated that all the included studies had a serious risk of bias. Conclusions: Our results suggest that using a robot-assisted approach is associated with a shorter duration of hospital stay and a longer duration of surgery.