Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: Open, Laparoscopic or Robotic Approach
Daniel Gavrilă, Ovidiu Bitere, Gabriela Droc, Monica Lăcătuş, Corina-Elena Minciuna, Vlad Ilie, Bogdan Trandafir, Vlad Herlea, Ștefan Tudor, Cătălin Vasilescu
- Year
- 2021
- Citations
- 10
- Access
- Open access
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive surgery provides a major advantage to APR, by avoiding an additional incision, the specimen being extracted through the perineal wound. The success of MIS APR seems to be assured by a good preoperative selection of the patients, alongside with experienced surgical teams in both open and minimally invasive rectal resections. The lack of conversion identified in robotic APR confirm the technical superiority over laparoscopic approach.
Keywords
Related papers
Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets
Daron Acemoğlu, Pascual Restrepo
2019
Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm
Leigh R. Hochberg, Daniel Bacher, Beata Jarosiewicz +8 more
2012
Campbell-Walsh urology
Alan J. Wein editor-in-chief
2012
Stroke rehabilitation
Peter Langhorne, Julie Bernhardt, Gert Kwakkel
2011