Home /Research /Comparison on intracochlear disturbances between drilling a manual and robotic cochleostomy
SURGICAL

Comparison on intracochlear disturbances between drilling a manual and robotic cochleostomy

Masoud Zoka Assadi, Xinli Du, James B. Dalton, Scott Henshaw, Chris Coulson, A. P. Reid, David Proops, P.N. Brett

Year
2013
Citations
12

Abstract

During cochlear implantation, hearing preservation is a concern. Minimizing disturbances to the cochlea and protection of the underlying endosteal membrane during the formation of a cochleostomy are considered important factors. The robotic micro-drill system tested in this article is the first example of an autonomous surgical drill successfully producing a cochleostomy, which keeps the underlying endosteal membrane intact. This study compares induced disturbances within the cochlea during formation of cochleostomy using the robotic micro-drill with that of conventional manual drilling. The disturbance of the endosteal membrane is measured using a Microscope Scanning Vibrometer at a third window, produced in the cochlea. Results show that the highest velocity amplitude measured was associated with manual drilling technique. The robotic micro-drill technique produced only about 1% of the peak velocity amplitude seen in manual drilling and exhibited much more uniform behaviour, while keeping the underlying membrane intact. The technique applied when using the robotic drill could be a major step in reducing the trauma to the cochlea, by reducing disturbance levels.

Keywords

CochleaDrillDrillingRound windowModiolus (cochlea)Biomedical engineeringAcousticsMedicineAnatomyMaterials science

Related papers

Browse all SURGICAL papers