Home /Research /Systematic review of open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted nephroureterectomy.
SURGICAL

Systematic review of open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted nephroureterectomy.

Emma Mullen, Kamran Ahmed, Ben Challacombe

Year
2017
Citations
21

Abstract

< .001). No statistical significance was found, however, following adjustment for confounding variables. Although statistically insignificant results were found when examining outcomes of RANU studies, they were promising and comparable with LNU and ONU with regard to oncologic outcomes. Results show that laparoscopic techniques are superior to ONU in perioperative results, and the longer-term oncologic outcomes look comparable. There is, however, a paucity of quality evidence regarding ONU, LNU, and RANU; data that address RANU outcomes are particularly scarce. As the robotic field within urology advances, it is hoped that this technique will be investigated further using gold standard research methods.

Keywords

MedicinePerioperativeCochrane LibraryCuffBlood lossMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trialObservational studyLaparoscopyNephrectomy

Related papers

Browse all SURGICAL papers