Long‐term results of quality of life after standard laparoscopic vs. robot‐assisted laparoscopic fundoplications for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease. A comparative clinical trial

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of telematic surgical approach in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is still unclear. METHODS: The aim of the study is to assess disease specific symptoms and quality of life in patients with GERD treated with either traditional laparoscopic (TL) or robot-assisted fundoplication using the Da Vinci system (DV) in long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Eighty patients underwent a fundoplication in 2003. Four years later all patients were given a standardized questionnaire and 59 (74%) replied. The TL group included 44 patients (18 male/26 female) and the DV group 15 patients (9 male/6 female); the mean operating time was 116 min for the TL group and 207 min for the DV group (p < 0.001). The mean GIQLI score was 106 points for TL and 107 points in the DV (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although a safe and feasible procedure, high functional costs of the Da Vinci system and longer operating time prevent this operation from being the standard surgical procedure for GERD.