Home /Research /A Sequence-specific Exopeptidase Activity Test (SSEAT) for “Functional” Biomarker Discovery
OTHER

A Sequence-specific Exopeptidase Activity Test (SSEAT) for “Functional” Biomarker Discovery

Josep Villanueva, Arpi Nazarian, Kevin Lawlor, San San Yi, Richard J. Robbins, Paul Tempst

Year
2007
Citations
86
Access
Open access

Abstract

One form of functional proteomics entails profiling of genuine activities, as opposed to surrogates of activity or active “states,” in a complex biological matrix: for example, tracking enzyme-catalyzed changes, in real time, ranging from simple modifications to complex anabolic or catabolic reactions. Here we present a test to compare defined exoprotease activities within individual proteomes of two or more groups of biological samples. It tracks degradation of artificial substrates, under strictly controlled conditions, using semiautomated MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis of the resulting patterns. Each fragment is quantitated by comparison with double labeled, non-degradable internal standards (all-d-amino acid peptides) spiked into the samples at the same time as the substrates to reflect adsorptive and processing-related losses. The full array of metabolites is then quantitated (coefficients of variation of 6.3–14.3% over five replicates) and subjected to multivariate statistical analysis. Using this approach, we tested serum samples of 48 metastatic thyroid cancer patients and 48 healthy controls, with selected peptide substrates taken from earlier standard peptidomics screens (i.e. the “discovery” phase), and obtained class predictions with 94% sensitivity and 90% specificity without prior feature selection (24 features). The test all but eliminates reproducibility problems related to sample collection, storage, and handling as well as to possible variability in endogenous peptide precursor levels because of hemostatic alterations in cancer patients. One form of functional proteomics entails profiling of genuine activities, as opposed to surrogates of activity or active “states,” in a complex biological matrix: for example, tracking enzyme-catalyzed changes, in real time, ranging from simple modifications to complex anabolic or catabolic reactions. Here we present a test to compare defined exoprotease activities within individual proteomes of two or more groups of biological samples. It tracks degradation of artificial substrates, under strictly controlled conditions, using semiautomated MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis of the resulting patterns. Each fragment is quantitated by comparison with double labeled, non-degradable internal standards (all-d-amino acid peptides) spiked into the samples at the same time as the substrates to reflect adsorptive and processing-related losses. The full array of metabolites is then quantitated (coefficients of variation of 6.3–14.3% over five replicates) and subjected to multivariate statistical analysis. Using this approach, we tested serum samples of 48 metastatic thyroid cancer patients and 48 healthy controls, with selected peptide substrates taken from earlier standard peptidomics screens (i.e. the “discovery” phase), and obtained class predictions with 94% sensitivity and 90% specificity without prior feature selection (24 features). The test all but eliminates reproducibility problems related to sample collection, storage, and handling as well as to possible variability in endogenous peptide precursor levels because of hemostatic alterations in cancer patients. In the current vernacular, the term proteomics most often stands for cataloguing large sets of proteins that may or may not include measurements of relative abundance and, on a rare occasion, absolute concentrations. One might describe it as the protein equivalent of microarray-based mRNA profiling. The favorite approach in most proteomics endeavors is identity-based shotgun analysis that involves digesting (e.g. with trypsin) complex protein mixtures into peptides followed by a mass spectrometric readout, utilizing diverse platforms and varying degrees of technological sophistication (1Washburn M.P. Wolters D. Yates III, J.R. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology.Nat. Biotechnol. 2001; 19: 242-247Crossref PubMed Scopus (4077) Google Scholar, 2Qian W.J.

Keywords

ProteomicsComputational biologyProteomeShotgun proteomicsChemistryBiomarker discoveryChromatographyBiochemistryBiology

Related papers

Browse all OTHER papers