Home /Research /Dynamics of Protein Turnover, a Missing Dimension in Proteomics
OTHER

Dynamics of Protein Turnover, a Missing Dimension in Proteomics

Julie M. Pratt, June Petty, Isabel Riba‐Garcia, Duncan H. L. Robertson, Simon J. Gaskell, Stephen G. Oliver, Robert J. Beynon

Year
2002
Citations
404
Access
Open access

Abstract

Functional genomic experiments frequently involve a comparison of the levels of gene expression between two or more genetic, developmental, or physiological states. Such comparisons can be carried out at either the RNA (transcriptome) or protein (proteome) level, but there is often a lack of congruence between parallel analyses using these two approaches. To fully interpret protein abundance data from proteomic experiments, it is necessary to understand the contributions made by the opposing processes of synthesis and degradation to the transition between the states compared. Thus, there is a need for reliable methods to determine the rates of turnover of individual proteins at amounts comparable to those obtained in proteomic experiments. Here, we show that stable isotope-labeled amino acids can be used to define the rate of breakdown of individual proteins by inspection of mass shifts in tryptic fragments. The approach has been applied to an analysis of abundant proteins in glucose-limited yeast cells grown in aerobic chemostat culture at steady state. The average rate of degradation of 50 proteins was 2.2%/h, although some proteins were turned over at imperceptible rates, and others had degradation rates of almost 10%/h. This range of values suggests that protein turnover is a significant missing dimension in proteomic experiments and needs to be considered when assessing protein abundance data and comparing it to the relative abundance of cognate mRNA species. Functional genomic experiments frequently involve a comparison of the levels of gene expression between two or more genetic, developmental, or physiological states. Such comparisons can be carried out at either the RNA (transcriptome) or protein (proteome) level, but there is often a lack of congruence between parallel analyses using these two approaches. To fully interpret protein abundance data from proteomic experiments, it is necessary to understand the contributions made by the opposing processes of synthesis and degradation to the transition between the states compared. Thus, there is a need for reliable methods to determine the rates of turnover of individual proteins at amounts comparable to those obtained in proteomic experiments. Here, we show that stable isotope-labeled amino acids can be used to define the rate of breakdown of individual proteins by inspection of mass shifts in tryptic fragments. The approach has been applied to an analysis of abundant proteins in glucose-limited yeast cells grown in aerobic chemostat culture at steady state. The average rate of degradation of 50 proteins was 2.2%/h, although some proteins were turned over at imperceptible rates, and others had degradation rates of almost 10%/h. This range of values suggests that protein turnover is a significant missing dimension in proteomic experiments and needs to be considered when assessing protein abundance data and comparing it to the relative abundance of cognate mRNA species. Four levels of analysis are commonly exploited in functional genomics: genome, transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome. The last three levels are all context-dependent; the complement of mRNA molecules, protein molecules, and metabolites all change with the physiological, developmental, or pathological state of living cells. A change in the proteome is probably the most important of these three for the analysis of gene action and interaction, but it is also the most difficult to study in a truly comprehensive manner (1.Miklos G.L. Maleszka R. Protein functions and biological contexts.Proteomics. 2001; 1: 169-178Google Scholar). “Classical” proteomics only compares amounts of proteins in cells in two different states or conditions; it does not address the dynamics of the proteome in the different biological states that are being compared nor does it provide information about the mechanisms whereby the system changes from one state to the other. The acquisition of a new steady-state level of any protein will

Keywords

Protein turnoverProteomicsDimension (graph theory)Computational biologyDynamics (music)ChemistryComputer scienceBiologyBiochemistryProtein biosynthesis

Related papers

Browse all OTHER papers