[CURRENT STATUS OF AND OUTLOOK FOR THE LATEST MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR COLORECTAL DISEASES].
Masahiko Watanabe
- 发表年份
- 2015
- 引用次数
- 2
摘要
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing laparoscopic surgery (LS) with open surgery (OS) in patients with colon cancer showed no statistical differences in, safety, and long-term outcomes. LS for colon cancer has become a standard procedure. LS for rectal cancer has also shown advantages, although RCTs showed no significant differences between groups in the long-term outcome. The magnification of laparoscopy enables surgeons to operate precisely in the narrow pelvis while sparing the autonomic nerves and nerves to the anal sphincter. Good visualization of the pelvis offers better education and will likely be used more frequently for rectal cancer. Invasion of rectal cancer to other organs and massive tumors are, however, technically demanding. The younger generation is more susceptible to Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and high recurrence rates mean more reoperations. Esthetic outcomes and minimal adhesion maximize the advantages of LS in treating Crohn's disease and IBD. Total proctocolectomy LS for IBD and ulcerative colitis is safe and minimally invasive. However, LS may take longer than OS, and emergencies such as toxic megacolon and massive hemorrhage remain contraindications. Ongoing clinical trials should reveal the feasibility of these new LS procedures in robotic and single-port surgery.
关键词
相关论文
Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets
Daron Acemoğlu, Pascual Restrepo
2019
Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm
Leigh R. Hochberg, Daniel Bacher, Beata Jarosiewicz 等 11 位作者
2012
Campbell-Walsh urology
Alan J. Wein editor-in-chief
2012
Stroke rehabilitation
Peter Langhorne, Julie Bernhardt, Gert Kwakkel
2011