What is the preferred mesh placement in primary ventral hernia repair? An international survey of 442 surgeons

摘要

PURPOSE: Primary ventral hernia repair is a common elective procedure; however, mesh placement practices vary widely, and there is limited evidence to guide optimal placement. This international study examined surgeons' preferences and considerations regarding mesh placement in elective primary ventral hernia repair. METHODS: We conducted an international cross-sectional survey targeting surgeons experienced in primary ventral hernia repair. The survey was distributed through hernia societies and social media platforms. It included 31 questions addressing surgeon demographics and their beliefs on various mesh placements. Data were collected using REDCap, Google Forms, and Questionstar. RESULTS: A total of 442 surgeons participated, with the majority being specialist surgeons (96%) who had performed at least 100 repairs (82%). Inlay was the least familiar mesh technique (26%). For hernia defects < 1 cm, preperitoneal (28%) and suture-only repair (27%) were considered to yield the best overall outcomes. For defects ≥ 1 to ≤ 4 cm, preperitoneal and retromuscular techniques were equally favored (34%), whereas retromuscular was regarded as the best option for larger defects (> 4 to 9 cm; 68%). Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches were increasingly preferred for larger defect sizes. Hernia defect size (93%), surgical history (90%), and obesity (80%) were the most common factors influencing the choice of mesh placement. CONCLUSION: Preperitoneal and suture-only repairs were most commonly selected for hernia defects < 1 cm, while preperitoneal and retromuscular placements were equally favored for defects ≥ 1 to ≤ 4 cm. For defects > 4 to 9 cm, retromuscular placement was selected by most surgeons. As defect width increased, laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches gained preference. Key factors influencing decisions included hernia defect size, surgical history, and obesity. The lack of strong supporting evidence highlights the need for further high-quality research.