Social robots in advanced dementia
Meritxell Valentí, Luis Agüera-Ortíz, Javier Olazarán Rodríguez, Carolina Mendoza Rebolledo, Almudena Pérez Muñoz, Irene Rodríguez Pérez, Emma Osa Ruiz, Ana Barrios Sánchez, Vanesa Herrero Cano, Laura Carrasco Chillón, Silvia Felipe Ruiz, Jorge López Álvarez, Beatriz León‐Salas, José María Plaza, Francisco Martín, Gonzalo Abella Dago, Pablo Martínez Martín
- 发表年份
- 2015
- 引用次数
- 240
- 访问权限
- 开放获取
摘要
AIMS: Pilot studies applying a humanoid robot (NAO), a pet robot (PARO) and a real animal (DOG) in therapy sessions of patients with dementia in a nursing home and a day care center. METHODS: In the nursing home, patients were assigned by living units, based on dementia severity, to one of the three parallel therapeutic arms to compare: CONTROL, PARO and NAO (Phase 1) and CONTROL, PARO, and DOG (Phase 2). In the day care center, all patients received therapy with NAO (Phase 1) and PARO (Phase 2). Therapy sessions were held 2 days per week during 3 months. Evaluation, at baseline and follow-up, was carried out by blind raters using: the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), the Severe Mini Mental State Examination (sMMSE), the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), the Apathy Scale for Institutionalized Patients with Dementia Nursing Home version (APADEM-NH), the Apathy Inventory (AI) and the Quality of Life Scale (QUALID). Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests performed by a blinded investigator. RESULTS: In the nursing home, 101 patients (Phase 1) and 110 patients (Phase 2) were included. There were no significant differences at baseline. The relevant changes at follow-up were: (Phase 1) patients in the robot groups showed an improvement in apathy; patients in NAO group showed a decline in cognition as measured by the MMSE scores, but not the sMMSE; the robot groups showed no significant changes between them; (Phase 2) QUALID scores increased in the PARO group. In the day care center, 20 patients (Phase 1) and 17 patients (Phase 2) were included. The main findings were: (Phase 1) improvement in the NPI irritability and the NPI total score; (Phase 2) no differences were observed at follow-up.
关键词
相关论文
The Organization of Behavior
D. O. Hebb
2005
The spread of true and false news online
Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, Sinan Aral
2018
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.
Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz, John T. Cacioppo
2007
Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets
Daron Acemoğlu, Pascual Restrepo
2019