首页 /研究 /Efficacy of the Da Vinci Surgical System in Abdominal Surgery Compared With That of Laparoscopy
SURGICAL

Efficacy of the Da Vinci Surgical System in Abdominal Surgery Compared With That of Laparoscopy

Sergio Maeso, Mercedes Reza, Julio Mayol, Juan Antonio Blasco‐Amaro, Mercedes Guerra, Elena Andradas, Nieves Plana

发表年份
2010
引用次数
395

摘要

In Brief Aim: The main aim of this review was to compare the safety and efficacy of the Da Vinci Surgical System (DVSS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in different types of abdominal intervention. Summary of Background Data: DVSS is an emerging laparoscopic technology. The surgeon directs the robotic arms of the system through a console by means of hand controls and pedals, making use of a stereoscopic viewing system. DVSS is currently being used in general, urological, gynecologic, and cardiothoracic surgery. Methods: This systematic review analyses the best scientific evidence available regarding the safety and efficacy of DVSS in abdominal surgery. The results found were subjected to meta-analysis whenever possible. Results: Thirty-one studies, 6 of them randomized control trials, involving 2166 patients that compared DVSS and CLS were examined. The procedures undertaken were fundoplication (9 studies, one also examining cholecystectomy), Heller myotomy (3 studies), gastric bypass (4), gastrectomy (2), bariatric surgery (1), cholecystectomy (4), splenectomy (1), colorectal resection (7), and rectopexy (1). DVSS was found to be associated with fewer Heller myotomy-related perforations, a more rapid intestinal recovery time after gastrectomy—and therefore a shorter hospital stay, a shorter hospital stay following cholecystectomy (although the duration of surgery was longer), longer colorectal resection surgery times, and a larger number of conversions to open surgery during gastric bypass. Conclusions: The publications reviewed revealed DVSS to offer certain advantages with respect to Heller myotomy, gastrectomy, and cholecystectomy. However, these results should be interpreted with caution until randomized clinical trials are performed and, with respect to oncologic indications, studies include variables such as survival. In comparison with conventional laparoscopic surgery, the Da Vinci Surgical System was associated with fewer Heller myotomy-related perforations, shorter intestinal recovery time and hospital stay following gastrectomy, a shorter hospital stay and a longer duration of surgery in cholecystectomy, longer colorectal resection surgery times, and more conversions during gastric bypass.

关键词

MedicineCholecystectomySurgeryGeneral surgeryAbdominal surgeryRandomized controlled trialLaparoscopyMyotomyGastrectomyLaparoscopic surgery

相关论文

查看 SURGICAL 分类全部论文